| hide answers Dan Barlow:
      I would save A-4-10-J. Why is pone leading a 4? A defensive play, because he 
      has a good hand and wants to slow me down for the skunk? Or an offensive 
      play, holding another 4 or an A? He's more 
      likely to have an A than another 4, and 
      since I can't prevent both offensive plays, I pair, playing my 4 
      confidently as if I have a pair of them myself. If he was leading from
      A-4, he may even give me a 10 or a J 
      to pair now. Five holes pegged, a decent hand and crib...thanks to my bold 
      play, I just may pull this game out! John Chambers:
      This is a defensive situation. You know your opponent will probably get 
      on Fourth Street. It's a matter of how far down on Fourth Street he gets. 
      You can have no control over how much he gets in his hand. But you do have 
      a little control over the pegging. If you keep him from getting too far on 
      Fourth you will at least have a chance to win the game. With your hand, a 
      good crib and then a decent hand as the non-dealer, you can get on Fourth 
      Street. If you hold down his pegging you may get to count your three hands 
      as the dealer on Fourth Street. If you try pegging, it will only help your 
      opponent get better position on Fourth Street. Realizing this, you would 
      not pair and you would not play the J (the most likely kept 
      tenth card). You would play the 10. DeLynn Colvert:
      I hold A-4-5-J. I'm a notoriously aggressive type, so on 
      a 4 lead, I'll pair away. George Rasmussen:
      Although it appears on the surface that I ought to pair the 4, 
      two points for me and a potential six for the pone could decide the game. 
      Taking two improves my position only slightly. Six for pone advances those 
      pegs to hole 90 with the hand still to score. Don't pair when this is the 
      situation! If pone were at 74, I would be willing to chance the six points 
      in order to gain two points for the pair. Let board position make your 
      decision. Michael Schell:
      A-2-4-5-10-J as dealer is an interesting case. 
      A-4-10-J and 2-5-10-J come out about the same in 
      the numbers, and even A-2-4-10 is a good try, since hands 
      with a 3/1 distribution of low and high cards usually peg much better for 
      dealer than 2/2 hands like A-4-x-x and 2-5-x-x. 
        
          
            | 
              
                | Keep | Toss |  |   Average  hand
 |  | Own crib: |    Expected   average
 |  
                |  | Static | Delta | Dynamic |  
                | A-2-4-10 | 5-J |  | 4.52 |  | 7.00 | +0.02 | 7.02 | 11.54 |  
                | A-4-10-J | 2-5 |  | 6.67 |  | 5.46 | +0.02 | 5.47 | 12.14 |  
                | 2-5-10-J | A-4 |  | 6.67 |  | 5.43 | 0.00 | 5.43 | 12.10 |  |  
            |  |  
            | 
              
                | Keep | Toss |  | Pegging (Schempp): |     | Pegging (Mueller): |  
                | Net | (pone/dealer) |  | Net | (pone/dealer) |  
                | A-2-4-10 | 5-J |  | +1.5 | (2.0/3.5) |  | +1.6 | (1.5/3.1) |  
                | A-4-10-J | 2-5 |  | +1.0 | (2.3/3.4) |  | +0.7 | (1.7/2.4) |  
                | 2-5-10-J | A-4 |  | +1.2 | (2.0/3.2) |  | +0.8 | (1.9/2.7) |  |  A-4-10-J is probably what I'd come up with over the 
      board, but any of these hands would be a good choice. Now to the pegging. Although I started the deal -1 to pone's +24, the 
      cut gives me a nine point hand (one more than average), and higher than 
      average expectations in the crib. Taking this into account, I'm 
      effectively somewhere near +1 (which would make pone -2). This calls for 
      cautious offense. Taking a naked pair of pone's lead is an aggressive 
      play, and not one that's generally valid for balanced play, since there's 
      no way no retaliate if you're tripled. And giving up six soft points could 
      get pone into Fourth Street position even with a mediocre hand. Although 
      my own position is not great, I'm going to drop the 10 
      instead and hope that safer pegging opportunities come my way later. Phyllis Schmidt:
      I'll keep A-4-10-J, since I prefer 2-5 to
      A-4 in my crib. I wouldn't pair the 4 lead, 
      but would try to hold opponent to a minimum. Play the 10 
      instead. Peter Setian:
      I would throw A-4 and keep 2-5-10-J, 
      mainly because the A-4 is more likely to be paired in the 
      crib than 2-5. (How often does the pone throw a 5?) 
      Also, 2-5-10-J is probably a better hold for staying out of 
      pegging trouble. But if I held A-4-10-J with the Q cut, I 
      would tend not to pair the 4 lead. Both players are in the 
      same "aggressive" position, but the pone has "first shot". So my primary 
      obligation would be to hold the pone back so long as I have a half way 
      decent hand (and crib). Something like a 7 cut would be a 
      different story. HALSCRIB:
      Before the deal I estimate that opponent will reach the stinkhole as 
      dealer three deals hence, and will therefore win by pegging. If I can slow 
      her down though, I could well win with only average cards. Thus I'm going 
      to play off, and hope that my cards hold up their end of the bargain. I 
      agree with the keep of A-4-10-J. It averages the same as
      2-5-10-J between hand and crib, and I think it's a trifle 
      safer in the pegging. A-2-4-10 would be good at a different 
      score, but its advantage over the other hands is in its offensive pegging 
      potential. Since I don't play to peg aggressively, its appeal is 
      diminished in this position. Here are my numbers, using the defensive 
      formula of: 
        defensive value = expected average - opponent's 
        pegging 
          
            | Keep | Toss |  | Defensive value
 |   Average  hand
 |  Own crib
 | Expected average
 | Average 
            pegging: Net (Pone/Dealer)
 |  
            | A-2-4-10 | 5-J |  | 9.87 | 4.52 | 6.83 | 11.35 | +1.63 
            (1.48/3.11) |  
            | A-4-10-J | 2-5 |  | 10.38 | 6.67 | 5.38 | 12.05 | +0.74 (1.67/2.41) |  
            | 2-5-10-J | A-4 |  | 10.00 | 6.67 | 5.20 | 11.87 | +0.83 (1.87/2.70) |  Of course I'll drop my 10 on pone's 4 
      lead, particularly after the favorable cut. PanelistsDan Barlow won the 1980 National Open Cribbage 
    Tournament, and made the 1985 All American Cribbage Team. His cribbage 
    strategy articles appeared in Cribbage World for many years, and can 
    be seen on the ACC 
    Web site. He also provides strategy tips at
    MSN Gaming 
    Zone. He has written seven books on cribbage, two of which have been glowingly reviewed in Games Magazine. All, including his latest book Winning Cribbage Tips, are available at
    
    The Cribbage Bookstore. John Chambers was one of the original founding 
    members of the ACC. He is a Grand Master, winner of seven major tournaments, 
    and author of 
    Cribbage: A 
    New Concept, He also directs three annual tournaments: the Ocean 
    State Cribbage Classic, New England Peer Championship and Charity Cribbage 
    Challenge. DeLynn Colvert (1931–2019) is the highest rated tournament player in the history of organized cribbage. He was a five-time National Champion, author of 
    Play 
    Winning Cribbage, longtime editor of the monthly magazine Cribbage World, 
    and the ACC's only Life Master - Seven Stars. He directs the Montana 
    Championship and Montana Open, both held annually in Missoula, and serves as 
    President of the ACC. George "Ras" Rasmussen is a Life Master - Two Stars, a four-time All-American, the national Grass Roots Division 1 champion in 2009, a former state champion in Virginia, Montana and Washington, and holds a Gold Award and a President's Award. He also directs the Washington State Championship, held 
    each year in Centralia, WA. His articles on cribbage are available on the
    ACC Web site. Michael Schell is a pioneer of modern cribbage theory, which synthesizes traditional concepts of expert play with new computer-informed insights and analysis. He has published Cribbage Forum since 2000. Schell holds a Bronze Award, is a Washington State Champion (2001), and was one of the principal architects of ACC Internet Cribbage. Phyllis Schmidt is a charter member of the ACC, and has been 
    playing cribbage for about 40 years. She is a Life Master - One Star, a 
    Senior Judge, a National Champion (1992) and winner of the ACC Tournament of Champions (2005). She attends about 30 
    tournaments a year. Peter Setian has played cribbage for over 20 years, and has been a 
    member of the ACC for about 14 years. During that time, he has won seven major tournaments and earned his Life Master rating. He plays in about 
    eight tournaments per year, including the ACC Tournament of Champions and 
    the annual Grand National. He enjoys participation in Grass Roots Club #72. HALSCRIB is widely regarded as the world's strongest computer 
    cribbage player. Its opinion was solicited using a special analysis version 
    of the program. Since HALSCRIB only speaks binary, its thoughts have been 
    translated into English by Michael Schell and its creator, Hal Mueller, a retired mathematics professor and eight-time ACC tournament winner. 
    For more information, see the
    HALSCRIB home page. |