Score 37*-39: You tossed yourself 3
4,
retaining 5
9
J
K.
The cut is the 6
and pone leads the 9.
What's your play? |
hide answers
Dan Barlow:
I'm always suspicious of a 9 lead. If he has a
3, that would have been a better lead. If he has
7s, 8s and 9s, he
shouldn't be leading the 9. If he has a 6,
it would be a better lead. My guess is that he's got a pair of
9s, or maybe A-5-5-9. I play the
K. In the unlikely event he has A-A-9-K,
he'll peg six, but I'll get three of them back.
John Chambers:
In this situation I would pair the 9. You are
about seven points out of position (hole 44). You have a good hand.
But you need more than that from the hole you're in. You need to
take a chance by pegging. You need to get into a position where your
next hand as the non-dealer will get you into position on Third
Street for your three counts.
DeLynn Colvert:
The suit of the 6 and 9 are red
herrings. I would play my 5, keeping the 9-J
for last to try for a run with the last two cards.
George Rasmussen:
I do not like dealing from hole 37* with opponent at 39. This
game appears close, but isn't. As dealer I am short seven holes from
the start of the Second Street critical position zone.
Email me
if you would like more specifics on CPZs.
Since the starter card is the 6
to match my flush, I have 15-6, a five-card flush, and the right
J for a total of 12 points. I don't really know if
the 6 cut is of any value in the crib with my
3-4 discard. A 6 cut with a 9
lead is somewhat alarming, as I want my opponent to have a small
hand count. Most players would lead the 6 if playing
a 6-9 couplet. The lead of a 9 is
often made from a pair. I play defensively in this situation and put
the K on that 9 lead. I want to limit
opponent to fewest possible points on score of hand and don't want
to give opportunities for non-dealer pegging.
Michael Schell:
I start the deal -7 to pone's +5, not great shape, but not
horrible. (I probably started the game as pone, so I've at least
improved from the -8 to +8 I had at the outset.) The cut gives me a
12 point hand, four more than the average. My 3-4 in
the crib is ordinarily worth 4.9, about average, though it's not
clear that the 6
will help. I'll call that even and guess that I'm effectively -3
thanks to my hand. Since that's closer to 0 then pone's +5, and
since pone's lead matches the starter, I'm going to guess that I
have better winning chances playing on than playing off or playing
balanced. Thus I'll take the naked pair and grab two points off the
9. This risks giving up a 27-7, but if pone has two
9s, she already has minimum position wrapped up with
two cards left to play. And if she has a hand heavy in mid-cards,
there's a good chance that my crib will catch a couple extra low
cards for seven or 12 more points.
Good players have traditionally regarded a 9 lead
as particularly dangerous to pair, and for good reason. But modern
players are increasingly leading a lone 9, say from
5-6-9-x or 9-10-J-Q. So it's getting
somewhat less dangerous to take this kind of pair than it used to
be.
Phyllis Schmidt:
I play my 5, staying away from any matching of
cards. I have a really good hand, so I'm going to hold back.
Peter Setian:
Hmm...to go for it, or not to? All things considered, I would
pair the 9 lead for three reasons:
- I'm within reach of a good dealing position, especially if
the pone threw a 2 in the crib
- Even if I play defensively (K) pone is likely
to still get a very good dealing position (45+ next hand),
especially with the 6 cut and a second 9
in the hand, so...
- With that second 9 in the pone's hand, I
don't think the six more peg points will be as crucial as my two
peg points, unless the pone has an unusual 20 point hand
HALSCRIB:
After the cut and opponent's lead, I expect to lose the game
seven deals hence if scoring is average on subsequent deals. As I
calculate the odds, my best shot to win is to play aggressively and
get the game over with in six deals. Hopefully I'll count out as
pone then, or perhaps peg out as dealer on the 7th deal. Though I'm
an underdog either way, I figure I have better chances pairing the
9 than playing safe with the 5 or
K.
Click
here for a
guide to cribbage notation and symbols.
Panelists
Dan Barlow won the 1980 National Open Cribbage
Tournament, and made the 1985 All American Cribbage Team. His cribbage
strategy articles appeared in Cribbage World for many years, and
can be seen on the
ACC Web site.
He also provides strategy tips at
MSN
Gaming Zone. He has written seven books on cribbage, two of which have been glowingly reviewed in Games Magazine. All, including his latest book Winning Cribbage Tips, are available at
The Cribbage Bookstore.
John Chambers was one of the original founding
members of the ACC. He is a Grand Master, winner of seven major
tournaments, and author of
Cribbage: A New Concept, He also directs three annual
tournaments: the Ocean State Cribbage Classic, New England Peer
Championship and Charity Cribbage Challenge.
DeLynn Colvert (1931–2019) is the highest rated tournament player in the history of organized cribbage. He was a five-time National Champion, author of
Play Winning Cribbage, longtime editor of the monthly magazine Cribbage World,
and the ACC's only Life Master - Seven Stars. He also directed two annual tournaments in Missoula, MT, served as the ACC's President, and was one of the game's most affable emissaries. It's scarcely an exaggeration to say that Colvert's career defines modern cribbage. George "Ras" Rasmussen is a Life Master - Two Stars, a four-time All-American, the national Grass Roots Division 1 champion in 2009, a former state champion in Virginia, Montana and Washington, and holds a Gold Award and a President's Award. He also directs the Washington
State Championship, held each year in Centralia, WA. His articles on
cribbage are available on the
ACC Web site.
Michael Schell is a pioneer of modern cribbage theory, which synthesizes traditional concepts of expert play with new computer-informed insights and analysis. He has published Cribbage Forum since 2000. Schell holds a Bronze Award, is a Washington State Champion (2001), and was one of the principal architects of ACC Internet Cribbage.
Phyllis Schmidt is a charter member of the ACC, and has been
playing cribbage for about 40 years. She is a Life Master - One Star, a
Senior Judge, a National Champion (1992) and winner of the ACC
Tournament of Champions (2005). She attends about 30
tournaments a year.
Peter Setian has played cribbage for over 20 years, and has
been a member of the ACC for about 14 years. During that time, he has
won seven major tournaments and earned his Life Master rating. He plays
in about eight tournaments per year, including the ACC Tournament of
Champions and the annual Grand National. He enjoys participation in
Grass Roots Club #72.
HALSCRIB is widely regarded as the world's strongest computer
cribbage player. Its opinion was solicited using a special analysis
version of the program. Since HALSCRIB only speaks binary, its thoughts
have been translated into English by Michael Schell and its creator, Hal Mueller, a retired mathematics professor and eight-time ACC tournament winner. For more information, see the
HALSCRIB home page.
|